Fixes an obvious bug in cdc-acm by avoiding a recursive lock on
acm_start_wb()'s error path. Should apply towards 2.6.27 stable and
2.6.28.
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.27-2-pae #109
---------------------------------------------
python/31449 is trying to acquire lock:
(&acm->write_lock){++..}, at: [<
f89a0348>] acm_start_wb+0x5c/0x7b [cdc_acm]
but task is already holding lock:
(&acm->write_lock){++..}, at: [<
f89a04fb>] acm_tty_write+0xe1/0x167 [cdc_acm]
other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by python/31449:
#0: (&tty->atomic_write_lock){--..}, at: [<
c0260fae>] tty_write_lock+0x14/0x3b
#1: (&acm->write_lock){++..}, at: [<
f89a04fb>] acm_tty_write+0xe1/0x167 [cdc_acm]
stack backtrace:
Pid: 31449, comm: python Not tainted 2.6.27-2-pae #109
[<
c030f42f>] ? printk+0xf/0x18
[<
c0149f33>] __lock_acquire+0xc7b/0x1316
[<
c014a63e>] lock_acquire+0x70/0x97
[<
f89a0348>] ? acm_start_wb+0x5c/0x7b [cdc_acm]
[<
c0312109>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x37/0x47
[<
f89a0348>] ? acm_start_wb+0x5c/0x7b [cdc_acm]
[<
f89a0348>] acm_start_wb+0x5c/0x7b [cdc_acm]
[<
f89a055d>] acm_tty_write+0x143/0x167 [cdc_acm]
[<
c0262a98>] write_chan+0x1cd/0x297
[<
c012527e>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0xd
[<
c026111e>] tty_write+0x149/0x1b9
[<
c02628cb>] ? write_chan+0x0/0x297
[<
c01912c5>] ? rw_verify_area+0x76/0x98
[<
c0260fd5>] ? tty_write+0x0/0x1b9
[<
c01919ba>] vfs_write+0x8c/0x136
[<
c0191afd>] sys_write+0x3b/0x60
[<
c0103beb>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x3f
=======================
Signed-off-by: Brandon Philips <bphilips@suse.de>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
}
/*
- * Finish write.
+ * Finish write. Caller must hold acm->write_lock
*/
static void acm_write_done(struct acm *acm, struct acm_wb *wb)
{
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&acm->write_lock, flags);
wb->use = 0;
acm->transmitting--;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&acm->write_lock, flags);
}
/*
{
struct acm_wb *wb = urb->context;
struct acm *acm = wb->instance;
+ unsigned long flags;
if (verbose || urb->status
|| (urb->actual_length != urb->transfer_buffer_length))
urb->transfer_buffer_length,
urb->status);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&acm->write_lock, flags);
acm_write_done(acm, wb);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&acm->write_lock, flags);
if (ACM_READY(acm))
schedule_work(&acm->work);
else