From: Tejun Heo Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:32:58 +0000 (+0900) Subject: [PATCH] libata: make ata_dev_knobble() per-device X-Git-Tag: v2.6.17-rc1~1182^2~63 X-Git-Url: http://pilppa.org/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8eabd02c246b808e0e27c3ee9ea17d0349efb06d;p=linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git [PATCH] libata: make ata_dev_knobble() per-device ata_dev_knobble() unconditionally used the first device of the port to determine whether a device is bridged or not. This causes bridge limit to be incorrectly applied or unapplied for hosts with slave devices (e.g. ata_piix). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c b/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c index 21ae752cd95..5e8a32052a1 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c @@ -1121,9 +1121,10 @@ err_out: } -static inline u8 ata_dev_knobble(const struct ata_port *ap) +static inline u8 ata_dev_knobble(const struct ata_port *ap, + struct ata_device *dev) { - return ((ap->cbl == ATA_CBL_SATA) && (!ata_id_is_sata(ap->device->id))); + return ((ap->cbl == ATA_CBL_SATA) && (!ata_id_is_sata(dev->id))); } /** @@ -1137,9 +1138,9 @@ static inline u8 ata_dev_knobble(const struct ata_port *ap) void ata_dev_config(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int i) { /* limit bridge transfers to udma5, 200 sectors */ - if (ata_dev_knobble(ap)) { + if (ata_dev_knobble(ap, &ap->device[i])) { printk(KERN_INFO "ata%u(%u): applying bridge limits\n", - ap->id, ap->device->devno); + ap->id, i); ap->udma_mask &= ATA_UDMA5; ap->host->max_sectors = ATA_MAX_SECTORS; ap->host->hostt->max_sectors = ATA_MAX_SECTORS;