]> pilppa.org Git - linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git/blobdiff - include/asm-mn10300/unaligned.h
omap mailbox: fix empty struct device for omap2
[linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git] / include / asm-mn10300 / unaligned.h
index cad3afbd035f1744d7c3751d252ab74c257347e3..0df671318ae4952d8a395da4c5c01ab61f040f11 100644 (file)
  * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
  * 2 of the Licence, or (at your option) any later version.
  */
-#ifndef _ASM_UNALIGNED_H
-#define _ASM_UNALIGNED_H
+#ifndef _ASM_MN10300_UNALIGNED_H
+#define _ASM_MN10300_UNALIGNED_H
 
-#include <asm/types.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned/access_ok.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
 
-#if 0
-extern int __bug_unaligned_x(void *ptr);
+#define get_unaligned  __get_unaligned_le
+#define put_unaligned  __put_unaligned_le
 
-/*
- * What is the most efficient way of loading/storing an unaligned value?
- *
- * That is the subject of this file.  Efficiency here is defined as
- * minimum code size with minimum register usage for the common cases.
- * It is currently not believed that long longs are common, so we
- * trade efficiency for the chars, shorts and longs against the long
- * longs.
- *
- * Current stats with gcc 2.7.2.2 for these functions:
- *
- *     ptrsize get:    code    regs    put:    code    regs
- *     1               1       1               1       2
- *     2               3       2               3       2
- *     4               7       3               7       3
- *     8               20      6               16      6
- *
- * gcc 2.95.1 seems to code differently:
- *
- *     ptrsize get:    code    regs    put:    code    regs
- *     1               1       1               1       2
- *     2               3       2               3       2
- *     4               7       4               7       4
- *     8               19      8               15      6
- *
- * which may or may not be more efficient (depending upon whether
- * you can afford the extra registers).  Hopefully the gcc 2.95
- * is inteligent enough to decide if it is better to use the
- * extra register, but evidence so far seems to suggest otherwise.
- *
- * Unfortunately, gcc is not able to optimise the high word
- * out of long long >> 32, or the low word from long long << 32
- */
-
-#define __get_unaligned_2(__p)                                 \
-       (__p[0] | __p[1] << 8)
-
-#define __get_unaligned_4(__p)                                 \
-       (__p[0] | __p[1] << 8 | __p[2] << 16 | __p[3] << 24)
-
-#define get_unaligned(ptr)                                     \
-({                                                             \
-       unsigned int __v1, __v2;                                \
-       __typeof__(*(ptr)) __v;                                 \
-       __u8 *__p = (__u8 *)(ptr);                              \
-                                                               \
-       switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) {                               \
-       case 1: __v = *(ptr);                   break;          \
-       case 2: __v = __get_unaligned_2(__p);   break;          \
-       case 4: __v = __get_unaligned_4(__p);   break;          \
-       case 8:                                                 \
-               __v2 = __get_unaligned_4((__p+4));              \
-               __v1 = __get_unaligned_4(__p);                  \
-               __v = ((unsigned long long)__v2 << 32 | __v1);  \
-               break;                                          \
-       default: __v = __bug_unaligned_x(__p);  break;          \
-       }                                                       \
-       __v;                                                    \
-})
-
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_2(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
-       *__p++ = __v;
-       *__p++ = __v >> 8;
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_4(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
-       __put_unaligned_2(__v >> 16, __p + 2);
-       __put_unaligned_2(__v, __p);
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_8(const unsigned long long __v, __u8 *__p)
-{
-       /*
-        * tradeoff: 8 bytes of stack for all unaligned puts (2
-        * instructions), or an extra register in the long long
-        * case - go for the extra register.
-        */
-       __put_unaligned_4(__v >> 32, __p + 4);
-       __put_unaligned_4(__v, __p);
-}
-
-/*
- * Try to store an unaligned value as efficiently as possible.
- */
-#define put_unaligned(val, ptr)                                                \
-       ({                                                              \
-               switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) {                               \
-               case 1:                                                 \
-                       *(ptr) = (val);                                 \
-                       break;                                          \
-               case 2:                                                 \
-                       __put_unaligned_2((val), (__u8 *)(ptr));        \
-                       break;                                          \
-               case 4:                                                 \
-                       __put_unaligned_4((val), (__u8 *)(ptr));        \
-                       break;                                          \
-               case 8:                                                 \
-                       __put_unaligned_8((val), (__u8 *)(ptr));        \
-                       break;                                          \
-               default:                                                \
-                       __bug_unaligned_x(ptr);                         \
-                       break;                                          \
-               }                                                       \
-               (void) 0;                                               \
-       })
-
-
-#else
-
-#define get_unaligned(ptr) (*(ptr))
-#define put_unaligned(val, ptr) ({ *(ptr) = (val); (void) 0; })
-
-#endif
-
-#endif
+#endif /* _ASM_MN10300_UNALIGNED_H */