use of explicit labels in inline asm is a Bad Idea(tm), since gcc can
decide to inline the function in several places.  Fixed by use of 1f/f:
instead of .Lfitsin/.Lfitsin:
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
                                "lra    3,0(%4)\n"
                                "lr     5,%5\n"
                                "diag   2,4,0x8\n"
-                               "brc    8, .Litfits\n"
+                               "brc    8, 1f\n"
                                "ar     5, %5\n"
-                               ".Litfits: \n"
+                               "1: \n"
                                "lr     %0,4\n"
                                "lr     %1,5\n"
                                : "=d" (return_code), "=d" (return_len)
                                "sam31\n"
                                "diag   2,4,0x8\n"
                                "sam64\n"
-                               "brc    8, .Litfits\n"
+                               "brc    8, 1f\n"
                                "agr    5, %5\n"
-                               ".Litfits: \n"
+                               "1: \n"
                                "lgr    %0,4\n"
                                "lgr    %1,5\n"
                                : "=d" (return_code), "=d" (return_len)