return ns;
 }
 
-/*
- * We place interactive tasks back into the active array, if possible.
- *
- * To guarantee that this does not starve expired tasks we ignore the
- * interactivity of a task if the first expired task had to wait more
- * than a 'reasonable' amount of time. This deadline timeout is
- * load-dependent, as the frequency of array switched decreases with
- * increasing number of running tasks. We also ignore the interactivity
- * if a better static_prio task has expired:
- */
-static inline int expired_starving(struct rq *rq)
-{
-       if (rq->curr->static_prio > rq->best_expired_prio)
-               return 1;
-       if (!STARVATION_LIMIT || !rq->expired_timestamp)
-               return 0;
-       if (jiffies - rq->expired_timestamp > STARVATION_LIMIT * rq->nr_running)
-               return 1;
-       return 0;
-}
-
 /*
  * Account user cpu time to a process.
  * @p: the process that the cpu time gets accounted to
 
                if (!rq->expired_timestamp)
                        rq->expired_timestamp = jiffies;
-               if (!TASK_INTERACTIVE(p) || expired_starving(rq)) {
+               if (!TASK_INTERACTIVE(p)) {
                        enqueue_task(p, rq->expired);
                        if (p->static_prio < rq->best_expired_prio)
                                rq->best_expired_prio = p->static_prio;